As someone once said, “The stock market is the only store in America where, when everything goes on sale, people run out the door!” However, the FAM Funds team gets excited and runs into the store seeking to invest in high-quality companies at bargain prices.
We do this with confidence because history demonstrates that stock markets tend to be fairly rational over the long term with prices typically correlating to the true economic value of the enterprises.
Discover what stocks our fund managers purchased in 2018 as well as their thoughts for 2019. FAM Funds 2018 Annual Letters
We are studying the economic and political concerns of the day. So far, our conclusion is that while these issues are quite real – we see many companies reporting slower growth and thinner profit margins – it remains unclear if they are severe enough to trigger a recession as some may fear.
Meanwhile, there are reasons to be optimistic. Many of the problems facing us will likely be resolved. For instance:
No matter your political leanings, we can all probably agree that politicians around the world tend to focus on self-preservation – while posturing is sure to be involved, we expect resolutions to both the U.S./China trade conflict and government shutdown
The Federal Reserve may decide that current conditions no longer warrant further interest rate increases
At the company level, challenges are usually met and overcome through a combination of ingenuity, hard work, and adaptation. With our holdings, this includes:
Finding suppliers outside of China to avoid tariffs, cutting costs, and raising prices to offset higher costs to the extent possible
Continuing efforts such as growing through product additions, entering new geographies, and acquiring smaller competitors
The economic and political backdrop in which we invest is always shifting. As a result, Fenimore tries to take advantage of opportunities when people sell due to fear and invest in enterprises that we estimate can do well, and grow, in a wide variety of scenarios.
Listen to an interview with Paul Hogan, CFA, Co-Manager of FAM Equity-Income Fund (FAMEX).
FAM Equity-Income Fund takes a distinct approach, applying a dividend growth focus to mid-cap stocks. In addition, the Fund maintains a concentrated portfolio and has a low turnover ratio given its high conviction holdings.
In the interview with Senior Vice President Anne Putnam, Paul discusses the Fund’s approach and Morningstar ranking along with the broad investment climate and specific opportunities we are seeing.
Rating, risk, and return values are relative to each fund’s Morningstar Category. Morningstar, an independent investment research firm, currently follows 382 mutual funds in its Mid-Cap Blend Category. The Morningstar RatingTM is a quantitative assessment of a fund’s past performance — both return and risk — as measured from 1 to 5 stars. It uses focused comparison groups to better measure fund manager skill. As always, the Morningstar RatingTM is intended for use as the first step in the fund evaluation process. A high rating alone is not a sufficient basis for investment decisions.
The Morningstar RatingTM for funds, or “star rating”, is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a managed product’s monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. The weights are: 100% three-year rating for 36-59 months of total returns, 60% five-year rating/40% three-year rating for 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.
The FAM Equity-Income Fund received a 5-Star Overall Morningstar RatingTM for the 3-Year, 5-Star Overall Morningstar RatingTM for the 5-Year, and 4-Star Overall Morningstar RatingTM for the 10-Year periods ending 12/31/2018 among 382, 335, and 235 Mid-Cap Blend funds, respectively.
Please consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The FAM Funds prospectus or summary prospectus contains this and other important information about the FAM Equity-Income Fund and should be read carefully before you invest or send money. To obtain a prospectus or summary prospectus and performance data that is current to the most recent month-end for each fund as well as other information on the FAM Equity-Income Fund, please go to famfunds.com or call (800) 932-3271.
This is the third in a series of posts about short-termism from FAM Value Fund Co-Manager Drew Wilson.
There are any number of reasons investors may find it difficult to achieve their financial goals. In some cases, unexpected and uncontrollable events can wreak havoc on a financial plan. But it is often an investor’s own actions that lead to the failure of meeting their objectives. There is a branch of science called Behavioral Finance dedicated to exploring how an individual’s propensities and predilections can short circuit rational investment decisions.
Unfortunately, in my opinion, there is a powerful gravitational pull that has fostered a short-term mindset with many investors. This force comes from academicians, practitioners, pundits, and the financial press who promote – wittingly or unwittingly – return-diminishing behaviors such as market-timing and performance-chasing.
How well does a short-term investment approach work? In my next post I’ll highlight a compelling research study that compares performance-chasing versus buy-and-hold behaviors. At FAM, we have a long-term approach; however, despite consistent results for buy-and-hold strategies, this research study exposes a challenge the investment industry faces. Stay tuned.
By Drew P. Wilson, CFA Investment Research Analyst
There are many who believe that short-termism hinders the U.S. economy. On June 6, 2018, corporate titans Jamie Dimon (CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co.) and Warren Buffett (famed investor and CEO of Berskshire Hathaway), wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal highlighting the problem of short-termism:
“…Companies frequently hold back on technology spending, hiring, and research and development to meet quarterly earnings forecasts that may be affected by factors outside the company’s control, such as commodity-price fluctuations, stock-market volatility and even the weather.”
“…The pressure to meet short-term earnings estimates has contributed to the decline in the number of public companies in America over the past two decades. Short-term-oriented capital markets have discouraged companies with a longer-term view from going public at all, depriving the economy of innovation and opportunity…”
Additionally, a McKinsey Global Institute study that focused on 2001 through 2014 shows that the economic costs can be material. Their research gleaned that firms with a long-term focus had materially higher revenues, earnings, profits, and market capitalizations at the end of this time compared to those who had a short-term view.
Next time, I’ll discuss how short-termism can hamstring many investors’ returns.
 Source: The Wall Street Journal’s Opinion, By Jamie Dimon and Warren E. Buffett, June 6, 2018
 Source: McKinsey Global Institute, “Measuring the Economic Impact of Short-Termism,” February 2017
By Drew P. Wilson, CFA Investment Research Analyst
Whether or not you are familiar with the term “short-termism,” it most likely affects you. In my opinion, short-termism is a vicious cycle that negatively affects both the economy and many investors’ returns. I believe that there is a natural tendency toward short-termism that is further influenced by the investment environment. I will address this in a future post.
To begin, though, let’s set the context for the problem with this definition from FCLT Global: “Too many investors continue to seek returns on their strategies as quickly as possible. Companies are missing out on profitable investments for fear of missing quarterly earnings guidance. Corporate management significantly undervalues and underinvests in longer-term prospects. Savers are missing out on potential returns because stock markets are penalizing companies that make long-term investments. Society is missing out on long-term growth and innovation because of underinvestment.” *
Do you have a short- or long-term view?
* Source: FCLT Global, “A roadmap for focusing capital on the long term.” September 2016